Guy Kawasaki touche un point fort important pour les entrepreneurs qui cherchent à lever du financement. Une question vient toujours les hanter: quelles sont les barrières à l’entrée pour vos compétiteurs; ou plus simplement, quelle avance / avantage avez-vous sur vos compétiteurs?
C’est souvent une question piège à laquelle il n’y a pas de véritable bonne réponse et quelques très mauvaises! Le but caché de cette question est de voir de quoi vous êtes fait et comment vous réagissez / pensez.
Lisez l’article parce qu’il pourrait vous sauver la vie, mais voyez tout de suite quoi ne pas répondre:
- “Patents make our business defensible.” Go
ahead and file them because you may someday achieve huge success and
therefore have the time and resources to go to court. However, the most
valuable outcomes of a patent are often impressing your parents and
filling up space in your MySpace profile. (The exception to this rule
is biotech, chip design, and medical devices where a patent really
means something.)As a startup, it’s highly unlikely that
patents will make your company defensible because you won’t have the
time or money to do battle with a Microsoft-esque competitor. Sure,
every few years you hear that Microsoft has to pay a company tens of
millions of dollars, but “suing Microsoft” isn’t a viable (or
attractive) business strategy. - “We’re the only guys who can do this.”
This is a signal to investors that you’re clueless and don’t even know
how to use Google. There are very few teams that have a monopoly on
knowledge or implementation skills. This is like Terrell Owens claiming
that he is the only wide receiver that can help a football team win the
Super Bowl, so skip the grand delusions. - “[Big-name potential competitor] won’t compete with us; they’ll simply have to buy us out.”
Speaking of grand delusions, this is even worse than TO’s. Espousing
the theory that what makes your company defensible is that potential
competitors will buy you out will put you in the main display of the
Bozo Hall of Fame.
Particulièrement #2. C’est celle que j’ai entendu dire le plus souvent, parfois même de la bouche de mes partenaires. J’ai toujours refusé cette affirmation parce qu’elle prouve deux choses: 1- vous êtes un idiot, 2- il n’y a pas de marché si c’est vrai… You’re screwed both ways comme disent les Chinois.
Signal Without Noise–by Guy Kawasaki: How to Change the World: Defensibility
Commentez, ou laissez un trackback à partir de votre propre site.

